On 11/24/09 11:49 PM, "Thomson, Martin" <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com> wrote:
>
> --
> This really only hints at a bigger issue with draft-stanley-... in that it
> incorrectly assumes that this data forms a civic address. Indoor location
> data is a new form of location information, it is not a "small expansion of
> the definition of a civic address". In many respects, indoor locations more
> closely resemble geodetic data.
>
> In any case, it should be clear from my explanation that this extension is not
> compatible with the definition of civic addresses.
>
How do you propose to revolutionize the myriad of people who are already
using reference point and offset in conjunction with civic.
"Hey Joe, run up on the 3rd floor and get my left-handed monkey wrench.
You'll see it on the floor about 30 west of elevator #1"
maybe
"Hey Joe, go get my left-handed monkey wrench, you'll find it at 33°56′46″S
151°10′38″E at 18m altitude."
-Marc-
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
