For some reason, I've been stiffed with dealing with AD discusses on
geopriv-policy. I consented before I read through Barry Leiba's
DISCUSS.
geopriv policy requires "standards action" for registrations of new
location profiles. Barry has requested justification.
Why?
It seems a bit much to me. common-policy already has mechanisms for
dealing with rules that contain not-supported elements. And code
points are in short supply. I'm inclined to suggest "specification
required" instead. At least I'd have no trouble justifying the
requirement for a reasonable specification.
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
