Re: [Geopriv] WGLC on draft-ietf-geopriv-held-measurements-04

One nit: section 4 and section 5 have the same title, which could be a bit confusing. Since section 4 is more about the data model elements than actual data types, I would suggest changing the section 4 title.

Alissa

On Mar 29, 2012, at 12:12 PM, Richard L. Barnes wrote:

> Dear GEOPRIV,
>
> This is a Working Group Last Call for comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-held-measurements-04:
> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-geopriv-held-measurements-04>
>
> Please send comments to the list no later than Friday, 20 April 2012.
>
> Remember that all comments are helpful, even if it's just "Looks good to me". You can also say "Doesn't look good to me", but it's more helpful to say why!
>
> Thanks,
> Alissa and Richard
> The GEOPRIV Chairs
> _______________________________________________
> Geopriv mailing list
> Geopriv@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv