I'm still not sure about 3 yet.
James
At 12:53 PM 12/14/2010, Alissa Cooper wrote:
>Please respond to these consensus calls ASAP. We received very little
>response thus far.
>
>Begin forwarded message:
>
>>From: Alissa Cooper <acooper@cdt.org>
>>Date: December 7, 2010 9:17:09 AM GMT
>>To: geopriv@ietf.org
>>Subject: [Geopriv] IETF 79 consensus calls
>>
>>We had a number of items from the meeting at IETF 79 that require
>>list consensus. Please respond by December 13 to indicate whether or
>>not you support each of the following:
>>
>>1. Adoption of the following milestone: "Submit policy control
>>mechanism for location configuration as Proposed Standard"
>>
>>2. Adoption of draft-barnes-geopriv-policy-uri-02 as a WG item (to
>>fulfill the above proposed milestone)
>>
>>3. Changing the scope of the current residential gateway milestone
>>("Submit recommendations for LIS discovery through residential
>>gateways as Informational") such that it applies only to first
>>parties, like so: "Submit recommendations for LIS discovery
>>conducted by hosts behind residential gateways as Informational"
>>
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Alissa
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Geopriv mailing list
>>Geopriv@ietf.org
>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Geopriv mailing list
>Geopriv@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
